Comments for Carbon Fixated http://carbonfixated.com Photosynthesising in a CO2-enriched world Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:35:51 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 Comment on A roundup of the serious news by facebook fans http://carbonfixated.com/a-roundup-of-the-serious-news/comment-page-1/#comment-103111 facebook fans Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:35:51 +0000 http://carbonfixated.com/a-roundup-of-the-serious-news/#comment-103111 I appreciate you for the ideas! We would do not have gotten this alone! Is it alright to reference point about this on my website basically include a backlink to this particular webpage? I appreciate you for the ideas! We would do not have gotten this alone! Is it alright to reference point about this on my website basically include a backlink to this particular webpage?

]]> Comment on Newtongate: the final nail in the coffin of Renaissance and Enlightenment ‘thinking’ by Climate Gate | Debunktion Junction http://carbonfixated.com/newtongate-the-final-nail-in-the-coffin-of-renaissance-and-enlightenment-thinking/comment-page-3/#comment-99880 Climate Gate | Debunktion Junction Thu, 12 Jan 2012 07:48:30 +0000 http://carbonfixated.com/newtongate-the-final-nail-in-the-coffin-of-renaissance-and-enlightenment-thinking/#comment-99880 [...] Newtongate: The Final Nail in the Coffin of Renaissance and Enlightenment Thinking, Carbon Fixated (A detailed examination of Isaac Newton’s private correspondences show that calculus is a lie perpetrated by deceitful “scientists.” [...] [...] Newtongate: The Final Nail in the Coffin of Renaissance and Enlightenment Thinking, Carbon Fixated (A detailed examination of Isaac Newton’s private correspondences show that calculus is a lie perpetrated by deceitful “scientists.” [...]

]]> Comment on Stephen Harper on Climate Change by Kent Kills Kyoto: Even the Taiwanese animators hate us : Canada's online magazine: Politics, entertainment, technology, media, arts, books: backofthebook.ca http://carbonfixated.com/stephen-harper-on-climate-change/comment-page-1/#comment-95255 Kent Kills Kyoto: Even the Taiwanese animators hate us : Canada's online magazine: Politics, entertainment, technology, media, arts, books: backofthebook.ca Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:35:59 +0000 http://carbonfixated.com/stephen-harper-on-climate-change/#comment-95255 [...] Even though his record speaks for itself. [...] [...] Even though his record speaks for itself. [...]

]]> Comment on Is it science or consensus? The Michael Crichton science/not science methodology by Steve http://carbonfixated.com/is-it-science-or-consensus-the-michael-crichton-sciencenot-science-methodology/comment-page-1/#comment-94266 Steve Sat, 10 Dec 2011 23:04:49 +0000 http://carbonfixated.com/is-it-science-or-consensus-the-michael-crichton-sciencenot-science-methodology/#comment-94266 Tim has got it right. The flowcharts are a complete travesty of Crichton's argument. If you read his whole article, instead of taking quotes out of context, it is clear that he has no problem with consensus per se. What infuriates him, and should infuriate anyone with an interest in true science, is the almost universal condemnation of "climate skeptics" on the basis that the consensus of scientists is against them. The science is in, they keep saying, but where (apart from the specialist meteorological journals, which most of us could not understand) is it? I have just read scientificamerican.com's latest "In Depth" report on "The Future of Climate Change", which had links to 35 or so articles; as far as I could see, only ONE article dealt with scientific evidence at all - and that one, ironically, was entitled "How Sunlight Controls Climate". Tim has got it right. The flowcharts are a complete travesty of Crichton’s argument. If you read his whole article, instead of taking quotes out of context, it is clear that he has no problem with consensus per se. What infuriates him, and should infuriate anyone with an interest in true science, is the almost universal condemnation of “climate skeptics” on the basis that the consensus of scientists is against them. The science is in, they keep saying, but where (apart from the specialist meteorological journals, which most of us could not understand) is it?
I have just read scientificamerican.com’s latest “In Depth” report on “The Future of Climate Change”, which had links to 35 or so articles; as far as I could see, only ONE article dealt with scientific evidence at all – and that one, ironically, was entitled “How Sunlight Controls Climate”.

]]> Comment on Qualifications creep by Max Hugoson http://carbonfixated.com/qualifications-creep/comment-page-1/#comment-87509 Max Hugoson Tue, 08 Nov 2011 16:44:49 +0000 http://carbonfixated.com/qualifications-creep/#comment-87509 Thanks for the Heads Up on Gavin Cooke. I'll stick with people with background, or demonstrated calculational ability. No need to COOK UP results. Max Hugoson, Skeptic Thanks for the Heads Up on Gavin Cooke.

I’ll stick with people with background, or demonstrated calculational ability.

No need to COOK UP results.

Max Hugoson, Skeptic

]]> Comment on Newtongate: the final nail in the coffin of Renaissance and Enlightenment ‘thinking’ by Newtongate: the final nail in the coffin of Renaissance and Enlightenment ‘thinking’ | Green Energy Global - Daily Green Energy News http://carbonfixated.com/newtongate-the-final-nail-in-the-coffin-of-renaissance-and-enlightenment-thinking/comment-page-3/#comment-72269 Newtongate: the final nail in the coffin of Renaissance and Enlightenment ‘thinking’ | Green Energy Global - Daily Green Energy News Fri, 12 Aug 2011 10:53:14 +0000 http://carbonfixated.com/newtongate-the-final-nail-in-the-coffin-of-renaissance-and-enlightenment-thinking/#comment-72269 [...] Fixated has an amusing spoof of the “ClimateGate” scandal – Newtongate: the final nail in the coffin of Renaissance and Enlightenment ‘thinking’. If you own any shares in companies that produce reflecting telescopes, use differential and [...] [...] Fixated has an amusing spoof of the “ClimateGate” scandal – Newtongate: the final nail in the coffin of Renaissance and Enlightenment ‘thinking’. If you own any shares in companies that produce reflecting telescopes, use differential and [...]

]]> Comment on Newtongate: the final nail in the coffin of Renaissance and Enlightenment ‘thinking’ by Carbon Fixated » Blog Archive » Newtongate: the final nail in the coffin of Renaissance and Enlightenment ‘thinking’ « TweetingDonal's dhídean http://carbonfixated.com/newtongate-the-final-nail-in-the-coffin-of-renaissance-and-enlightenment-thinking/comment-page-3/#comment-70314 Carbon Fixated » Blog Archive » Newtongate: the final nail in the coffin of Renaissance and Enlightenment ‘thinking’ « TweetingDonal's dhídean Sat, 30 Jul 2011 16:34:13 +0000 http://carbonfixated.com/newtongate-the-final-nail-in-the-coffin-of-renaissance-and-enlightenment-thinking/#comment-70314 [...] But perhaps the most damaging revelations are those concerning the way these math nerd scientists may variously have manipulated or suppressed evidence to support their cause. via carbonfixated.com [...] [...] But perhaps the most damaging revelations are those concerning the way these math nerd scientists may variously have manipulated or suppressed evidence to support their cause. via carbonfixated.com [...]

]]> Comment on Newtongate: the final nail in the coffin of Renaissance and Enlightenment ‘thinking’ by Newtongate: the final nail in the coffin of Renaissance and Enlightenment ‘thinking’ | Green Energy Panels - How to Save Energy http://carbonfixated.com/newtongate-the-final-nail-in-the-coffin-of-renaissance-and-enlightenment-thinking/comment-page-3/#comment-69176 Newtongate: the final nail in the coffin of Renaissance and Enlightenment ‘thinking’ | Green Energy Panels - How to Save Energy Sat, 23 Jul 2011 15:22:51 +0000 http://carbonfixated.com/newtongate-the-final-nail-in-the-coffin-of-renaissance-and-enlightenment-thinking/#comment-69176 [...] admin Carbon Fixated has an amusing spoof of the “ClimateGate” scandal – Newtongate: the final nail in the coffin of Renaissance and Enlightenment ‘thinking’. If you own any shares in companies that produce reflecting telescopes, use differential and [...] [...] admin Carbon Fixated has an amusing spoof of the “ClimateGate” scandal – Newtongate: the final nail in the coffin of Renaissance and Enlightenment ‘thinking’. If you own any shares in companies that produce reflecting telescopes, use differential and [...]

]]> Comment on Is it science or consensus? The Michael Crichton science/not science methodology by Tim http://carbonfixated.com/is-it-science-or-consensus-the-michael-crichton-sciencenot-science-methodology/comment-page-1/#comment-65747 Tim Mon, 04 Jul 2011 18:50:28 +0000 http://carbonfixated.com/is-it-science-or-consensus-the-michael-crichton-sciencenot-science-methodology/#comment-65747 What Crichton was clearly implying is that just because a whole bunch of scientists agree on something, it doesn't make it right or science (ie the world is flat, the sun revolves around the earth, etc). Science is science whether or not the majority agrees with the results. Even in your explanation from Crichton on how you formulated your charts, it shows you didn't read what he said. He didn't say that ONLY one person can be right in order for it to be science. His point was that it only REQUIRES one. Here's an example: If a consensus of scientists said 2+2=5, it doesn't make them right just because the majority agrees. All it takes to put consensus science as the sham that it is is for one scientist to prove that 2+2=4. So if that one person has "results that are verifiable by reference to the real world" (as in provable or "reproducible" and not just theoretical like global warming), it doesn't matter how many people agree otherwise if they're wrong, it only matters what that one person can prove. No one has (or will) prove that anthropological global warming is real. That is why consensus science is not real science. So despite Al Gore claiming that the "consensus science" is in, it only needs one person to scientifically prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that climate change is natural to shatter the whole AGW theory and its consensus. What Crichton was clearly implying is that just because a whole bunch of scientists agree on something, it doesn’t make it right or science (ie the world is flat, the sun revolves around the earth, etc). Science is science whether or not the majority agrees with the results. Even in your explanation from Crichton on how you formulated your charts, it shows you didn’t read what he said. He didn’t say that ONLY one person can be right in order for it to be science. His point was that it only REQUIRES one.
Here’s an example: If a consensus of scientists said 2+2=5, it doesn’t make them right just because the majority agrees. All it takes to put consensus science as the sham that it is is for one scientist to prove that 2+2=4. So if that one person has “results that are verifiable by reference to the real world” (as in provable or “reproducible” and not just theoretical like global warming), it doesn’t matter how many people agree otherwise if they’re wrong, it only matters what that one person can prove. No one has (or will) prove that anthropological global warming is real. That is why consensus science is not real science. So despite Al Gore claiming that the “consensus science” is in, it only needs one person to scientifically prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that climate change is natural to shatter the whole AGW theory and its consensus.

]]> Comment on Andrew Weaver wins one against Canada Free Press, no news on National Post libel case by Kelly Manning http://carbonfixated.com/andrew-weaver-wins-one-against-canada-free-press-no-news-on-national-post-libel-case/comment-page-1/#comment-60207 Kelly Manning Wed, 01 Jun 2011 05:45:57 +0000 http://carbonfixated.com/andrew-weaver-wins-one-against-canada-free-press-no-news-on-national-post-libel-case/#comment-60207 Andrew Weaver is represented by McConchie Law Corporation. Roger D. McConchie (and David A. Potts) literally wrote the book on “Canadian Libel and Slander Actions” http://www.irwinlaw.com/store/product/85/canadian-libel-and-slander-actions McConchie law corporation also prepared the statement of defense for Dr, Dan Johnson when 8 year Geography professor Tim Ball sued Dr. Johnson and 4 Calgary Herald editors for $325,000, alleging defamation. The responses from McConchie, and from the Calgary Herald’s advocates, were so effective, and so devastating, that former Geography Professor Ball gave up. http://www.desmogblog.com/sites/beta.desmogblog.com/files/TBall%20statement%20of%20claim.pdf http://www.desmogblog.com/sites/beta.desmogblog.com/files/Johnson%20statement%20of%20defence.pdf http://www.desmogblog.com/sites/beta.desmogblog.com/files/Calgary%20Herald%20Statement%20of%20Defence.pdf Andrew Weaver is represented by McConchie Law Corporation.

Roger D. McConchie (and David A. Potts) literally wrote the book on “Canadian Libel and Slander Actions”

http://www.irwinlaw.com/store/product/85/canadian-libel-and-slander-actions

McConchie law corporation also prepared the statement of defense for Dr, Dan Johnson when 8 year Geography professor Tim Ball sued Dr. Johnson and 4 Calgary Herald editors for $325,000, alleging defamation.

The responses from McConchie, and from the Calgary Herald’s advocates, were so effective, and so devastating, that former Geography Professor Ball gave up.

http://www.desmogblog.com/sites/beta.desmogblog.com/files/TBall%20statement%20of%20claim.pdf

http://www.desmogblog.com/sites/beta.desmogblog.com/files/Johnson%20statement%20of%20defence.pdf

http://www.desmogblog.com/sites/beta.desmogblog.com/files/Calgary%20Herald%20Statement%20of%20Defence.pdf

]]>