Feed on
Posts
Comments

There’s a list of 450 “peer reviewed papers supporting skepticism of ‘man-made’ global warming” making the rounds on the internet. Let’s take a closer look at it.

When peer review doesn’t mean peer review

Take a glance at that list, and it just leaps out at you: so many of the papers are all from the same source, from a journal called Energy & Environment. I counted 79 out of the 450, all from just one journal. Now, it isn’t the case that global warming is a small, narrowly focused field of research; if it was, one might expect it to be served by relatively few journals, and this large number of papers from a single journal wouldn’t be so strange. But global warming is a very broad field of research. It draws on a large number of disciplines, from atmospheric physics, paleoclimatology, marine science and more. It should, therefore, strike you as odd that fully 17% of the skeptical papers on this list all come from the journal Energy & Environment. And what a journal it is. From wikipedia:

“The journal is not listed in the ISI’s Journal Citation Reports indexing service for academic journals, although it is included in Scopus, which lists it as a trade journal, with coverage from 1995. “

So E&E doesn’t merit a listing in JCR, and hence has no impact factor, which, for publishing scientists, can be a big deal. The quality of the journal in which one publishes can count toward ones career. E&E simply would not count, and Scopus just lists it as a trade journal, which isn’t worth much at all. To pile on still further:

“The journal’s peer-review process has at times been criticised for publishing substandard papers. Roger A. Pielke (Jr), who published a paper on hurricane mitigation in the journal, said in a post answering a question on Nature’s blog in May about peer-reviewed references and why he published in E&E: “…had we known then how that outlet would evolve beyond 1999 we certainly wouldn’t have published there.”"

What good peer review provides is confidence that what you are reading has been scrutinised by relevant experts in the field. I can’t begin to comprehend, then, who scrutinised and approved this E&E paper. Perhaps it was the timecube guy. This author wants you to know that everything we know about the sun, our “currently fashionable model” for it, is in fact wrong:

“Analyses of planets, the Moon, the solar wind, solar flares, the solar photosphere, and ordinary meteorites show that our Sun is actually the violent, ill mannered remains of a supernova that once ejected all of the heavier elements on Earth and in the solar system and now selectively moves lightweight elements into a veneer of H and He that covers the Sun’s energetic neutron core [18]. This brings the IPCC conclusions into question and, more importantly, the draconian solutions that some policymakers advocate.”

Fair enough, I suppose. If we can’t even figure out what that big glowing thing in the sky is, then we certainly shouldn’t do anything about global warming. After all, if the sun was secretly all along a neutron star, and nobody noticed, then, heck, everything we think we know about everything can be called into question. Especially the IPCC conclusions. Right?

There are standards in science, and one of them is peer review. Scientists know what it is and what it isn’t, and the review process in a sub standard vanity press journal like E&E, well, isn’t. Let’s just take the E&E papers out of this list. It’s better for it, as a lot of what remains in the list really isn’t junk.

Skepticism, or just scientists doing science?

Here’s how you know man made global warming science is not a religion: it keeps on trying to debunk itself. Here’s one way you can see it keeps on trying to debunk itself: this list of 450 papers (well, excepting the dross from E&E).

It is an accepted scientific norm that research, once conducted and reported, can be challenged. Nothing is sacred and nothing is untouchable. Accordingly, here’s a great example of just that from the list.

That’s the Richard Lindzen, climate contrarian, Professor of Meteorology at MIT, lead author of Chapter 3 of the IPCC’s Third Assessment Report. He went to a symposium organised by the Charles D. Keeling, the man who first recorded the progressive atmospheric accumulation of CO2, and pretty much a rock star in climatological terms; and he presented a paper challenging the most fundamental aspect of man made global warming, that increasing carbon dioxide causes climate change. And what did the prestigious National Academy of Sciences do with that highly skeptical paper?

They published it.

And that, people, is how scientists do science.

A question of context

So here we are, 2009, 12 years later, and the idea that increasing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere will cause climate change is still the accepted consensus. What Lindzen wrote in 1997 didn’t overturn that consensus. It challenged it, but that wasn’t enough. The reason is that there exists a preponderance of evidence for man made global warming. This list of 450 disparate papers, many of which are from just one junk journal, does not make for a coherent scientific argument against man made global warming. In fact, the creators of the list don’t bother to explain why each paper is “skeptical of man made global warming”; and I find myself skeptical that many of these papers even come close to doing any such thing. If there is a coherent case to be made against “man made global warming”, it isn’t being made by this list.

Picking only the papers that appear to be skeptical of a topic, without considering the totality of the research published on that topic, is called cherry picking. Compare and contrast with the IPCC. It isn’t as though the IPCC doesn’t consider contrary research findings in its reviews: it does. The following example (from the TAR) shows this review process in action:

“5.1 Observed changes in terrestrial (including freshwater) species distributions, population sizes, and community composition.

The IPCC evaluated the effect of climate change on biological systems by assessing 2,500 published studies. Of these, 44 studies, which included about 500 taxa, met the following criteria: 20 or more years of data; measuring temperature as one of the variables; the authors of the study finding a statistically significant change in both a biological/physical parameter and the measured temperature; and a statistical correlation between the temperature and the change in the biological/physical parameter. Some of these studies investigated different taxa (e.g. bird and insect) in the same paper. Of a total of 59 plants, 47 invertebrates, 29 amphibians and reptiles, 388 birds, and 10 mammal species, approximately 80% showed change in the biological parameter measured (e.g. start and end of breeding season, shifts in migration patterns, shifts in animal and plant distributions, and changes in body size) in the manner expected with global warming, while 20% showed change in the opposite direction. Most of these studies have been carried out in the temperate and high-latitude areas and in some high altitude areas. These studies show that some ecosystems that are particularly sensitive to changes in regional climate (e.g. high-altitude and high-latitude ecosystems) have already been affected by changes in climate.”

Now think what would happen if the IPCC worked the same way as the creator of this “450 papers” list. We would have a list of papers showing changes in the biological parameter that were only consistent with global warming. By not considering the totality of the evidence, for and against, and putting it in context, we would get a quite false impression of the state of research. If the creator of the “450 papers” list had been given the same job, we would have a list of papers that only showed changes in biological parameters that were not consistent with global warming. Either way, it would be cherry picking, and therefore misleading. What we get from the IPCC review instead is the honestly reported finding that 20% of their datasets did not support global warming. They weren’t ignored or suppressed, but put into context, we can see that the preponderance of the datasets rather did support global warming.

It is possible for hundreds of research papers to exist that are “skeptical of man made global warming”, and at the same time, for the existence of such papers to be insufficient to overturn the consensus on man made global warming. It’s a question of putting research into context, and considering the totality of the evidence.

“The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function.”
-F. Scott Fitzgerald

What should have been done

What this topic needs is a fair review. Some group to take a look at all the evidence relating to man made global warming, for and against, weigh it up, pull out the main themes and the most well supported research findings, and report all this in a transparent and open manner. Put these “skeptical” papers in context, and provide an overview of the level of scientific certainty on the topic of “man made global warming.”

Come to think of it, the IPCC reports do just that.

This list of 450 papers doesn’t really prove anything. It scores a cheap rhetorical point, perhaps, by showing – albeit incompetently – that skepticism exists in the peer reviewed climate science literature, but really that just demonstrates that climate science is, well, science, rather than being a religion that silences all its heretics.

So please don’t be fooled by silly junk like this list. Consider the totality of the evidence, and don’t fall for the temptation of cherry picking only the research that supports your point of view.

48 Responses to “Skeptical about 450 “peer reviewed” papers skeptical of global warming”

  1. Poptech says:

    “Journal Citation Reports” is a commercial product of the Thomson Reuters corporation and uses a subjective ranking system.

    “Impact Factor” is a subjective determination of popularity not scientific validity,

    Show Me The Data
    http://jcb.rupress.org/cgi/content/full/179/6/1091
    (The Journal of Cell Biology, Volume 179, Number 6, pp. 1091-1092, December 2007)
    - Mike Rossner, Heather Van Epps, Emma Hill

    Irreproducible results: a response to Thomson Scientific
    http://jcb.rupress.org/cgi/content/full/180/2/254
    (The Journal of Cell Biology, Volume 180, Number 2, pp. 254-255, January 2008)
    - Mike Rossner, Heather Van Epps, Emma Hill

    The Scopus listing is wrong since E&E has nothing to do with any specific “trade” such as say “chemical engineering” ect…

    EBSCO correctly lists it as an academic journal.
    http://www.ebscohost.com/titleLists/eih-coverage.pdf

    The Manuel papers are clearly a radical new theory but they do not represent the common skeptical position, however the papers are skeptical of AGW.

    E&E is not a sub-standard or vanity journal, it is a peer-reviewed interdisciplinary academic journal.

    Actually the UK has just determined that it is a religion,

    Climate change belief given same legal status as religion (The Daily Telegraph, UK)
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthnews/6494213/Climate-change-belief-given-same-legal-status-as-religion.html

    This is interesting “criteria”,

    “the authors of the study finding a statistically significant change in both a biological/physical parameter and the measured temperature; and a statistical correlation between the temperature and the change in the biological/physical parameter”

    They cherry picked 44 papers out of 2500, knowing full well that ones meeting this “criteria” would show the “change” they were looking for. Thanks for helping make my point!

    If the list of 450 papers was so irrelevant then you would not feel the need to post on it.

  2. [...] if those are unconvincing, Carbon Fixated draws our attention to this gem EARTH’S HEAT SOURCE – THE SUN by Oliver K. Manuel E&E [...]

  3. CAM says:

    Poptech: Why don’t you explain the point of the list.
    Maybe these questions will help:
    What do you think your list shows or achieves?
    What criteria were used in its compilation (which databases, with which search terms)?
    Why did you compile it?
    How do you decide if a paper is “skeptical” or not? What is the threshold?

  4. Tony Zito says:

    /good grief! I hope that EBSCO will reconsider classifying E&E as an academic journal. I cannot imagine an honest and reputable journal publishing this nearly psychotic passage:

    “Analyses of planets, the Moon, the solar wind, solar flares, the solar photosphere, and ordinary meteorites show that our Sun is actually the violent, ill mannered remains of a supernova that once ejected all of the heavier elements on Earth and in the solar system and now selectively moves lightweight elements into a veneer of H and He that covers the Sun’s energetic neutron core [18]. This brings the IPCC conclusions into question and, more importantly, the draconian solutions that some policymakers advocate.”

    This is damning, wouldn’t you say, Poptech? If you are trying to argue for or against something, you don’t want to be associated with E&E. Just a little friendly advice.

  5. [...] Global Warming” as seen in numerous blogger websites (here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here). Poptech’s ALARM was added later when he realised his mistake in listing [...]

  6. אומגה 3 says:

    מגוון רחב של ויטמינים, תוספי תזונה ברזל, מגה גלופקס ועוד..

  7. Hi! I just wanted to ask if you ever have any trouble with
    hackers? My last blog (wordpress) was hacked and I ended up losing many months of hard
    work due to no back up. Do you have any methods to protect against hackers?

    I am greatful that you currently taking a period to see my user profile.
    You are welcome to have a look at my own web-site
    as well for supplemental advice and very helpful suggestions :
    : http://partyplanningcentral.blog.com/

  8. good advice says:

    Heya i am for the first time here. I found
    this board and I find It really useful & it helped me out a
    lot. I hope to give something back and aid others like you helped me.

  9. Wow, fantastic blog layout! How long have you been blogging for?
    you made blogging look easy. The overall look of your web site is wonderful, as
    well as the content!

    Also visit my web-site: Highly recommended Website

  10. user-pic says:

    Oh my goodness! Incredible article dude! Many thanks, However I am going through troubles with your RSS.
    I don’t understand why I am unable to join it. Is there anyone else getting similar RSS problems? Anyone who knows the answer will you kindly respond? Thanks!!

  11. With so few game publishers with this group, it’s not worth a lot. I have severe doubts about the games industry believing you will find the future in PC my life, even if an ever smaller class of PC gamers are.

  12. Quality articles is the crucial to invite the people to pay
    a visit the web page, that’s what this site is providing.

  13. Heriberto says:

    Right here is the right website for everyone who would like to find out about this topic.
    You realize a whole lot its almost tough to argue with you (not that I actually would want
    to…HaHa). You certainly put a new spin on a subject that has been written about for decades.
    Excellent stuff, just wonderful!

  14. google.com says:

    I was very happy to find this website. I need to to thank you for ones time for this particularly wonderful read!!
    I definitely loved every part of it and i also have you book marked to see new information
    on your blog.

    Also visit my blog; search engine optimization (google.com)

  15. Magaret says:

    Great website. Plenty of helpful information here. I am sending it to several
    pals ans also sharing in delicious. And naturally, thanks to your effort!

    Feel free to visit my weblog flower delivery valencia
    ca (Magaret)

  16. Roxanna says:

    Hello! I understand this is kind of off-topic however I
    had to ask. Does running a well-established blog like yours take a lot
    of work? I am completely new to operating a blog but I do write in my diary everyday.

    I’d like to start a blog so I will be able to share my own experience
    and thoughts online. Please let me know if you have any kind of ideas or tips for brand new aspiring blog owners.
    Thankyou!

    Here is my homepage – home loans; Roxanna,

  17. I’m really enjoying the design and layout of
    your site. It’s a very easy on the eyes which makes it much more enjoyable for me to come
    here and visit more often. Did you hire out a designer to create your theme?
    Outstanding work!

  18. Hey I know this is off topic but I was wondering if you knew of any
    widgets I could add to my blog that automatically tweet my newest
    twitter updates. I’ve been looking for a plug-in like this
    for quite some time and was hoping maybe you would have
    some experience with something like this. Please let me know if
    you run into anything. I truly enjoy reading your blog and I look forward to your
    new updates.

  19. Excellent beat ! I wish to apprentice even as you
    amend your website, how can i subscribe for a weblog website?
    The account helped me a appropriate deal. I were tiny bit familiar of this your broadcast offered
    vibrant clear idea

    My website Garcinia cambogia

  20. Excellent website. Lots of helpful information here.
    I am sending it to a few friends ans additionally sharing in delicious.
    And naturally, thanks in your effort!

  21. I don’t even know how I ended up here, but I thought this put
    up used to be great. I don’t recognise who you might be however certainly you’re going to
    a famous blogger in case you aren’t already. Cheers!

    Here is my web blog: make money expert

  22. Zonia says:

    I see a lot of interesting articles on your
    website. You have to spend a lot of time writing, i know how to save you a lot of time,
    there is a tool that creates unique, SEO friendly articles in couple of minutes, just type in google – laranita’s free content source

  23. It’s a pity you don’t have a donate button! I’d most
    certainly donate to this outstanding blog! I suppose for now i’ll settle for book-marking and adding your RSS feed to my Google account.
    I look forward to brand new updates and will talk about this site with my Facebook group.

    Chat soon!

    my web blog – muskoka cottage rentals

  24. Lorna says:

    Thhis i? a topic tgat is close t? mmy heart…
    T?ke care! Whede arre ?our contact details t?ough?

    ?ere is my ?age … hostess (Lorna)

  25. When I initially commented I clicked the
    “Notify me when new comments are added” checkbox and now each time a comment is added I get four emails with the
    same comment. Is there any way you can remove me from that
    service? Thanks!

  26. Thank you, I’ve just been searching for info about this topic for a while and yours is the best I have discovered so far.
    However, what about the conclusion? Are you sure in regards to
    the supply?

    Visit my web site; android hack via bluetooth (http://blog.studiorimhawaii.com/)

  27. This blog was… how do you say it? Relevant!! Finally I
    have found something that helped me. Thanks!

  28. Bill says:

    I read a lot of interesting articles here. Probably you
    spend a lot of time writing, i know how to save you a lot of work, there is an online tool that creates high quality, google
    friendly articles in seconds, just search
    in google – laranitas free content source

  29. banya08.com says:

    I comentario siempre I apreciar como a post en Página web o
    tengo add a la discusión . Por lo general es resultado de
    el fuego visualizado en el article I navegado .
    Y después article % blog_titulo %. I que realmente estaba emocionado suficiente
    para Poste a comentario ;-) I realidad tienen algunas preguntas
    para usted si se trata de bien . ¿Será o no algunas de
    Para comentarios comparecer como son por muerte cerebral individuos ?
    :-P Y , si usted es escritura a sitios sociales , que había
    nada todo nuevo tienes que publicar . Podría hacer
    una lista los urls completas de todo tu sociales Sitios
    como tu perfil de LinkedIn , Facebook o Twitter feed ?

  30. serwatka says:

    Very shortly this website will be famous amid all blog viewers, due to it’s pleasant articles
    or reviews

  31. Facts just do not matter if those facts get in the way of their political or social engineering goals.
    When you miss one another, matching couple tshirts will help
    create the “bond” that may surpasse time and
    also long distance and retain your relationship alive. Bob turned that childhood expertise into a profession managing
    a business that specializes in rentals of Gatlinburg cabins and Pigeon Forge cabins.
    It may be tiny but it won’t have second thoughts of backing down from a fight, even with bigger
    dogs. But this fact stays the same: They have mastered the art of bringing the best of their curls to have a sexy stunning look.

    My homepage … images cute and funny friendship quotes

  32. Download The Simpsons Tapped Out Cheat.
    The Simpsons Tapped Out Cheat is the best generator for Donut and
    Coins. Now you don`t have worry about your account thanks to special anti-ban system.

    Download now and have a fun.

    Here is my blog simpsons tapped out donut cheat

  33. There are lots of similarities and differences that will pick which games are ideal for which player.
    Children who hesitate and like math number can enjoy mathematical games and also at once may have fun. Beatable casino games include
    Blackjack, poker games and video poker games. It is considered that cards playing started in India before evolving and moving along with other countries.
    Plus: With the Plus rule in play, the worth on the sides of the cards is put into
    the worth for the sides of one’s opponents cards that it’s alongside.
    Unit Command by Wildcat Gaming can be a smart and refreshing military trading cards game.
    Now that you’ve the guidelines figured out, you happen to be
    ready for a few basic Monopoly Deal Strategy.
    However, it is considered that learning the game is
    a lot easier and may take a shorter time as well, but mastering it’s going to definitely try taking some time.
    As mentioned before, certain cards will be more powerful in a few
    terrains. Just Say No: Does playing a “Just Say No” card on your own turn count just as one action. Upon winning, not only do you will get points, but also to be
    able to choose a card from your opponent’s collection, rendering his army weaker and making your army stronger.
    So, playing a 4-cost building will ask you to discard 4 other
    building cards. * An orange or brown trading cards describes Pokemon with earth,
    rock and fighting abilities. In addition they’ve terrific themes that could be based on all forms of factors, from
    super heroes to sporting game titles. Almost building upon the framework
    left by Mystic Cards, Spectromancer furthers the depth
    and structure of the overall game, producing something with perhaps better aesthetics compared to the retail released Puzzle Quest.
    Although these strategies can greatly enhance your winning potential,
    they are able to also call unnecessary negative awareness of you and thus should oftimes be avoided, lest you get kicked out of the casino.
    For example they’ve superb graphics that happen to get eye catching and entertaining to judge
    whilst you participate in. (In some very strict
    games, a new player’s turn continues in such a situation provided
    that the credit card he fishes for completes a novel for him.
    Deciding between cards and craps mostly depends around the preference
    of the player. *Ancient Chinese people invented cards in ninth century *Appeared around 1300 AD in Europe *Spread fast around 1380s from
    Spain and Italy to France and Germany *By 1534,
    there are about 35 different cards *Around 1800s, the Americans
    started to use their own cards and also invented Joker.
    2011 saw a number of the major platform providers instructed to up-size
    their dealer studios so they could provide enough tables to pay
    growing demand from players. You as well as your opponent’s lose sanity while
    playing most cards and in case you keep the sanity level of the
    opponent lowest, your assailant go “insane” this also could really help you win the
    game more easily. Article Source: 10 Classic Free Family Card Games
    With Instructions Anyone Could Follow – Perfect For The Whole Family.

    If you want to know more about how the bottom game is played, please read our Dominion review.
    Although they just don’t enjoy the identical degree of popularity today,
    there are numerous folks that still play them.

  34. viagra says:

    Highly descriptive post, I enjoyed that bit. Will there
    be a part 2?

    my web-site :: viagra

  35. Cedric says:

    From there, it becomes an easy the answer to get players’ account
    information from Microsoft when they are logged into Xbox Live.
    The latter of such two is very important, because there have been many cases of
    enormous companies suing those who are thought to have downloaded illegal files, based solely on his or her IP address.
    You will not have to wait hours before you actually watch a movie.

  36. In this endless runner Android game, you help four fleas fly through a
    grassy underground cave while avoiding walls and other objects.

    Klondike Solitaire is the perfect alternative to the original solitaire that you’ve played on your PC.

    Lead your club or country to glory with the first FIFA game optimized for Android.

  37. Because on this operate, an excellent long-term reliability.

    Here is often a look at that history and how the wristwatch made its method to
    being one from the number one functional products we wear
    today. 0 stereo Bluetooth headsets, built-in 850 m – A capacity battery,
    talking time is 2-3 hours, standby 150-300 hours and possesses a built-in 1.
    99 ($245) plus a required 18-month cellular policy for text alerts and
    site services ranging from $4. It comes in beautiful designs, patterns and features.

  38. Christi says:

    Hopefully, you are now prepared with strategies to enhance your
    gaming. Buildings, units, and weaponry upgrades can be earned, and there’s a
    world-boss-like Goblin King to conquer. In this free app there are weapons, armor and special abilities
    to unlock.

  39. This is the right web site for everyone who really wants to
    understand this topic. You realize so much its almost hard to argue with you (not that I actually will need to…HaHa).

    You certainly put a fresh spin on a topic that’s been written about for decades.
    Excellent stuff, just great!

  40. Link exchange is nothing else however it is just placing the other person’s website link on your page at suitable place and other person will also do similar in support of you.

  41. That system, you’ve got yourself a Bitcoin wallet on your coins.
    S, Europe and China, Bitcoin is covered by current laws, forcing the criminals”, followed by Australia, Denmark and Switzerland.

  42. I am in fact grateful to the holder of this website who has shared this
    great article at here.

  43. Dolores says:

    Useful info. Lucky me I found your site by accident, and I’m
    surprised why this twist of fate did not took place earlier!
    I bookmarked it.

  44. Asking questions are in fact good thing if you are not understanding something entirely, except this article gives nice understanding even.

  45. Gregorio says:

    Es gran que vas a encontrar Ideas de la artículo
    , así como de nuestra discusión hecho en este lugar .

  46. Excellent weblog here! Also your site lots up very fast!
    What web host are you using? Can I get your
    associate hyperlink in your host? I wish my web site loaded up
    as quickly as yours lol

  47. Star says:

    Y si ha decidido marcharse a Europa, pídanos presupuesto porque también realizamos traslados hasta cualquier ciudad europea a la que necesite mudarse.

Leave a Reply