Feed on

There’s a list of 450 “peer reviewed papers supporting skepticism of ‘man-made’ global warming” making the rounds on the internet. Let’s take a closer look at it.

When peer review doesn’t mean peer review

Take a glance at that list, and it just leaps out at you: so many of the papers are all from the same source, from a journal called Energy & Environment. I counted 79 out of the 450, all from just one journal. Now, it isn’t the case that global warming is a small, narrowly focused field of research; if it was, one might expect it to be served by relatively few journals, and this large number of papers from a single journal wouldn’t be so strange. But global warming is a very broad field of research. It draws on a large number of disciplines, from atmospheric physics, paleoclimatology, marine science and more. It should, therefore, strike you as odd that fully 17% of the skeptical papers on this list all come from the journal Energy & Environment. And what a journal it is. From wikipedia:

“The journal is not listed in the ISI’s Journal Citation Reports indexing service for academic journals, although it is included in Scopus, which lists it as a trade journal, with coverage from 1995. “

So E&E doesn’t merit a listing in JCR, and hence has no impact factor, which, for publishing scientists, can be a big deal. The quality of the journal in which one publishes can count toward ones career. E&E simply would not count, and Scopus just lists it as a trade journal, which isn’t worth much at all. To pile on still further:

“The journal’s peer-review process has at times been criticised for publishing substandard papers. Roger A. Pielke (Jr), who published a paper on hurricane mitigation in the journal, said in a post answering a question on Nature’s blog in May about peer-reviewed references and why he published in E&E: “…had we known then how that outlet would evolve beyond 1999 we certainly wouldn’t have published there.””

What good peer review provides is confidence that what you are reading has been scrutinised by relevant experts in the field. I can’t begin to comprehend, then, who scrutinised and approved this E&E paper. Perhaps it was the timecube guy. This author wants you to know that everything we know about the sun, our “currently fashionable model” for it, is in fact wrong:

“Analyses of planets, the Moon, the solar wind, solar flares, the solar photosphere, and ordinary meteorites show that our Sun is actually the violent, ill mannered remains of a supernova that once ejected all of the heavier elements on Earth and in the solar system and now selectively moves lightweight elements into a veneer of H and He that covers the Sun’s energetic neutron core [18]. This brings the IPCC conclusions into question and, more importantly, the draconian solutions that some policymakers advocate.”

Fair enough, I suppose. If we can’t even figure out what that big glowing thing in the sky is, then we certainly shouldn’t do anything about global warming. After all, if the sun was secretly all along a neutron star, and nobody noticed, then, heck, everything we think we know about everything can be called into question. Especially the IPCC conclusions. Right?

There are standards in science, and one of them is peer review. Scientists know what it is and what it isn’t, and the review process in a sub standard vanity press journal like E&E, well, isn’t. Let’s just take the E&E papers out of this list. It’s better for it, as a lot of what remains in the list really isn’t junk.

Skepticism, or just scientists doing science?

Here’s how you know man made global warming science is not a religion: it keeps on trying to debunk itself. Here’s one way you can see it keeps on trying to debunk itself: this list of 450 papers (well, excepting the dross from E&E).

It is an accepted scientific norm that research, once conducted and reported, can be challenged. Nothing is sacred and nothing is untouchable. Accordingly, here’s a great example of just that from the list.

That’s the Richard Lindzen, climate contrarian, Professor of Meteorology at MIT, lead author of Chapter 3 of the IPCC’s Third Assessment Report. He went to a symposium organised by the Charles D. Keeling, the man who first recorded the progressive atmospheric accumulation of CO2, and pretty much a rock star in climatological terms; and he presented a paper challenging the most fundamental aspect of man made global warming, that increasing carbon dioxide causes climate change. And what did the prestigious National Academy of Sciences do with that highly skeptical paper?

They published it.

And that, people, is how scientists do science.

A question of context

So here we are, 2009, 12 years later, and the idea that increasing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere will cause climate change is still the accepted consensus. What Lindzen wrote in 1997 didn’t overturn that consensus. It challenged it, but that wasn’t enough. The reason is that there exists a preponderance of evidence for man made global warming. This list of 450 disparate papers, many of which are from just one junk journal, does not make for a coherent scientific argument against man made global warming. In fact, the creators of the list don’t bother to explain why each paper is “skeptical of man made global warming”; and I find myself skeptical that many of these papers even come close to doing any such thing. If there is a coherent case to be made against “man made global warming”, it isn’t being made by this list.

Picking only the papers that appear to be skeptical of a topic, without considering the totality of the research published on that topic, is called cherry picking. Compare and contrast with the IPCC. It isn’t as though the IPCC doesn’t consider contrary research findings in its reviews: it does. The following example (from the TAR) shows this review process in action:

“5.1 Observed changes in terrestrial (including freshwater) species distributions, population sizes, and community composition.

The IPCC evaluated the effect of climate change on biological systems by assessing 2,500 published studies. Of these, 44 studies, which included about 500 taxa, met the following criteria: 20 or more years of data; measuring temperature as one of the variables; the authors of the study finding a statistically significant change in both a biological/physical parameter and the measured temperature; and a statistical correlation between the temperature and the change in the biological/physical parameter. Some of these studies investigated different taxa (e.g. bird and insect) in the same paper. Of a total of 59 plants, 47 invertebrates, 29 amphibians and reptiles, 388 birds, and 10 mammal species, approximately 80% showed change in the biological parameter measured (e.g. start and end of breeding season, shifts in migration patterns, shifts in animal and plant distributions, and changes in body size) in the manner expected with global warming, while 20% showed change in the opposite direction. Most of these studies have been carried out in the temperate and high-latitude areas and in some high altitude areas. These studies show that some ecosystems that are particularly sensitive to changes in regional climate (e.g. high-altitude and high-latitude ecosystems) have already been affected by changes in climate.”

Now think what would happen if the IPCC worked the same way as the creator of this “450 papers” list. We would have a list of papers showing changes in the biological parameter that were only consistent with global warming. By not considering the totality of the evidence, for and against, and putting it in context, we would get a quite false impression of the state of research. If the creator of the “450 papers” list had been given the same job, we would have a list of papers that only showed changes in biological parameters that were not consistent with global warming. Either way, it would be cherry picking, and therefore misleading. What we get from the IPCC review instead is the honestly reported finding that 20% of their datasets did not support global warming. They weren’t ignored or suppressed, but put into context, we can see that the preponderance of the datasets rather did support global warming.

It is possible for hundreds of research papers to exist that are “skeptical of man made global warming”, and at the same time, for the existence of such papers to be insufficient to overturn the consensus on man made global warming. It’s a question of putting research into context, and considering the totality of the evidence.

“The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function.”
-F. Scott Fitzgerald

What should have been done

What this topic needs is a fair review. Some group to take a look at all the evidence relating to man made global warming, for and against, weigh it up, pull out the main themes and the most well supported research findings, and report all this in a transparent and open manner. Put these “skeptical” papers in context, and provide an overview of the level of scientific certainty on the topic of “man made global warming.”

Come to think of it, the IPCC reports do just that.

This list of 450 papers doesn’t really prove anything. It scores a cheap rhetorical point, perhaps, by showing – albeit incompetently – that skepticism exists in the peer reviewed climate science literature, but really that just demonstrates that climate science is, well, science, rather than being a religion that silences all its heretics.

So please don’t be fooled by silly junk like this list. Consider the totality of the evidence, and don’t fall for the temptation of cherry picking only the research that supports your point of view.

68 Responses to “Skeptical about 450 “peer reviewed” papers skeptical of global warming”

  1. tas terbaru says:

    What’s up Dear, are you genuinely visiting this web page regularly,
    if so then you will absolutely get pleasant experience.

  2. HOME.A says:

    Hi there, You have done an excellent job. I’ll definitel digg it and
    personally recommend to my friends. I’m confident they’ll be benefited from this

  3. Facebook says:

    Mano explains, “In grade 9 I could not touch the mesh.
    My family and quite a few of the people on our block were
    from Sicily, Italy. The band writes, records, mixes, and masters
    their songs in the basement studio in Glasgow.

  4. Wilmer says:

    “Sometimes giving simply your schedule can definitely generate somebody else smile,” ?n line with
    th? website. Tell your visitors with plenty oof forethought
    ?here the following art sho?, craft market or gallery showing will b?.

    Use onlione follow-?p methods li?? email and be?ome willing
    to use direct mail.

    My webpwge :: colon ingests nutrients (Wilmer)

  5. Hi everyone, it’s my first visit at this website, and piece of
    writing is truly fruitful in support of me, keep up posting these
    types of articles.
    creditos rapidos y faciles

  6. Kristin says:

    Nice replies in return of this matter with real arguments and telling the whole
    thing about that.

  7. He has been personally featured numerous times in leading journals pertaining to music production including
    Sound on Sound, Future Music, Computer Music and Keyboard,
    thanks to his cutting-edge production techniques.

    From the UK, is currently the world’s most dynamic and contemporary re-libraries of
    music. Creating beats is just the first step to
    making good music.

  8. Carlos says:

    A spray bottle is excellent but a bottle that has a top that is
    squirt works too.

    my site webpage [Carlos]

  9. Adam says:

    Restoration1 will also restore your property if it is affected by smoke damage, even if there was no fire
    on your property. Drying out the property from the root
    cause helps get rid of moisture completely.
    Unsanitary water can come from sources like over flowing toilets, drainage ditches,
    rain Water Damage Restoration, Adam,
    or other foul places that could be filled with contaminants.

  10. Thanks on your marvelous posting! I definitely enjoyed reading
    it, you are a great author. I will make certain to bookmark
    your blog and will often come back from now on. I want to encourage
    you to ultimately continue your great work, have a nice evening!

  11. Nannette says:

    Game testers need depth of knowledge and keen observations skills.
    Using culture as “demonized” rectification of names.
    So if you and your family are noot familiar with some othedr
    types of games, thee classic board gaes would just be fine.

  12. Remember that the point of your email marketing campaign is to make friends with your future customers.
    Email marketing help maintaining an efficient follow-up system for your business.
    Are they aware of the procedure for filing
    for bankruptcy and to what degree.

  13. ACV is represented here to be some miracle health tonic that may treatment something and do the whole lot.

  14. I could contact it, but not snap it. Now, after utilizing this system I have the highest vertical on my entire freshman and JV team.

  15. H? ? amm kavin, itss myy fiest timne t?? commenting anyplace, whrn ? reaqd tbis piede oof writing ? thiught i coild alsoo mke commentt ddue tto t?is goold article.

    Heree iss mmy blog: verdana condo

  16. I pay a visit day-to-day some web pages and information sites
    to read articles, but this weblog gives feature based writing.

  17. Darell says:

    Thank forr tthe gopod writeup. ?t inn reality ?sed too bee a lejsure account ?t.
    Glane complicated t?o mlre broought greeable fromm ?ou!

    ?? thee way, hoow coul? wwe kwep upp a correspondence?

    Heere iss myy weeb pasge …Beautyy secttion oof Amazon ffor ani wrinkle/anti ahing skkincare
    productts (Darell)

  18. I needed to th?nk you for this great read!!
    I definitely loved every bit of ?t. I’ve g?t you bookmarked to look at new stuff
    you post…

    my web blog; Curry Shoes Black,Curry Shoes Review,Curry Shoes 2014,Curry Shoes Foot Locker,Curry Shoes Lexington Ky,Curry Shoes Size 7,Curry Shoes Size 8,Curry Shoes White,Curry Shoes Nike,Curry Shoes Under Armour,Curry Shoes Blue,Curry Shoes Bury St Edmunds,Curry Basketball Shoes,Curry Birthday Shoes,Stephen Curry Shoes Brand,Stephen Curry Shoes Blue Splash,Seth Curry Basketball Shoes,Stephen Curry Bhm Shoes,Stephen Curry Blue Shoes,Curry Shoes Clutchfit,Curry Shoes Cheap,Curry Shoes Commercial,Curry Christmas Shoes,Howard Curry Shoes Coupons,Stephen Curry Shoes Cost,Stephen Curry Shoes Collection,Stephen Curry Shoes Champs,Stephen Curry Cupcake Shoes,Stephen Curry Current Shoes,Curry Shoes Dark Matter,Curry Shoes Deah,Stephen Curry Shoes Deal,Stephen Curry Shoes Release Date,Derry Curry Shoes,Dell Curry Shoes,Curry Shoes Ebay,Stephen Curry Shoes Ebay,Stephen Curry Shoes Eastbay,Eddy Curry Shoes,Curry Shoes Finish Line,Curry Shoes Father To Son,Stephen Curry Shoes For Sale,Stephen Curry Shoes Foot Locker,Stephen Curry Shoes For Sale Philippines,Stephen Curry Shoes For Sale Ebay,Stephen Curry Shoes 2013 For Sale,Stephen Curry Basketball Shoes For Sale,Stephen Curry Gold Shoes For Sale,Curry Gold Shoes,Howard Curry Shoes Groupon,Stephen Curry Shoes Green,Stephen Curry Game Shoes,Stephen Curry Grammy Shoes For Sale,Curry Golden Shoes,Stephen Curry Shoes Hyperfuse,Stephen Curry Home Shoes,Howard Curry Shoes,Haute Curry Shoes,Haute Curry Shoes Online,Howard Curry Shoes Talking Tree,Haute Curry Shoes Online Shopping,Curry Shoes Inc,Howard Curry Shoes In Lexington Ky,Stephen Curry Shoes Images,Stephen Curry Shoes Price In Philippines,Stephen Curry Jordan Shoes,Joe Curry Shoes,Stephen Curry Knicks Shoes,Stephen Curry Shoes Vs Knicks,Keo Curry Shoes,Curry Shoes Low,Curry Shoes List,Stephen Curry Latest Shoes,Stephen Curry Lebron Shoes,Clae Jones Curry Leather Shoes,Curry Shoes Mi30,Stephen Curry Mlk Shoes 2014,Does Stephen Curry Make Shoes,Curry Shoes New,Stephen Curry Shoes Nike,Stephen Curry Shoes Name,Stephen Curry Shoes Nba 2K13,Stephen Curry Shoes Nba 2K14,New Stephen Curry Shoes,Nina Curry Shoes,Nba Curry Shoes,Stephen Curry Shoes 2013 Name,Stephen Curry Shoes Online,Stephen Curry Shoes On Sale,Buy Haute Curry Shoes Online,Curry Shoes Price,Curry Shoes Preschool,Stephen Curry Shoes Price,Stephen Curry Shoes Philippines,Stephen Curry Shoes Pics,Stephen Curry Shoes Playoffs 2013,Stephen Curry Shoes Picture,Stephen Curry Purple Shoes,Stephen Curry Preseason Shoes,Curry Shoes Release Date,Curry Shoes Red,Curry Shoes Size 10,Curry Shoes Size 9,Curry Shoes Stolen,Curry Stephen Shoes,Howard Curry Shoes Store,Stephen Curry Signature Shoes,Stephen Curry Stat Shoes,Stephen Curry Shoes Tonight,Stephen Curry Shoes To Buy,Stephen Curry Shoes The Zone,Stephen Curry Shoes Under,Stephen Curry Shoes 2013 Under Armour,Stephen Curry Shoes 2014 Under Armour,Stephen Curry Shoes Vs Portland,Stephen Curry Voodoo Shoes,Stephen Curry Shoes Warriors,Stephen Curry Shoes Where To Buy,Stephen Curry Shoes With Stats,Stephen Curry Shoes White,Curry Shoes Yellow,Stephen Curry Shoes Yellow,Stephen Curry Shoes Youth,Ann CurryS Yellow Shoes,Curry Shoes 1,Curry Shoes 2015 Price,Curry Shoes 2015,Curry Shoes 2015 Foot Locker,Curry Shoes 2013,Stephen Curry Shoes 2013 Price,Stephen Curry Shoes 2K13,Stephen Curry Shoes 2011,Stephen Curry Shoes 2010,Stephen Curry 30 Shoes,Stephen Curry 3 Shoes,Stephen Curry Shoes,Stephen Curry Shoes Review,Stephen Curry Shoes 2014,Stephen Curry Shoes Black,Stephen Curry Shoes Under Armour,Stephen Curry Shoes Birthday,Stephen Curry Shoes Blue And White,Stephen Curry Shoes Blue,Stephen Curry Shoes Buy,Stephen Curry Shoes Black And Yellow,Stephen Curry Shoes Brand Name,Stephen Curry Shoes Cheap,Stephen Curry Shoes Candy,Stephen Curry Shoes Colorway,Stephen Curry Shoes Customize,Stephen Curry Shoes Commercial,Stephen Curry Shoes Christmas,Stephen Curry Shoes Canada,Stephen Curry Shoes Dubai,Stephen Curry Under Armour Shoes Release Date,Stephen Curry Christmas Day Shoes,Stephen Curry Mlk Day Shoes,Stephen Curry Shoe Endorsement,Stephen Curry Shoes For Cheap,Stephen Curry Shoes Finish Line,Stephen Curry Shoes Gold,Stephen Curry Shoes Grey,Stephen Curry Gold Sneakers,Stephen Curry Shoes All Star Game,Stephen Curry Game Worn Shoes,Stephen Curry Game Used Shoes,Stephen Curry Shoes Home,Stephen Curry Shoes History,Stephen Curry Shoes How Much,Does Stephen Curry Have Shoes,How Much Stephen Curry Shoes,Stephen Curry Black History Month Shoes,Stephen Curry Shoes In Philippines,Stephen Curry Shoes In Malaysia,Stephen Curry Shoes Low Top,Stephen Curry Shoes Latest,Stephen Curry Shoes List,Stephen Curry Shoe Line,Stephen Curry Under Armour Shoes Foot Locker,Stephen Curry Shoes Mens,Stephen Curry Shoes Malaysia,Stephen Curry Shoe Model,How Much Does Stephen Curry Shoes Cost,Stephen Curry Shoes New,Stephen Curry Shoes Nba 2K15,Stephen Curry Shoes Nba,Stephen Curry Shoes Nz,Stephen Curry Nike Shoes 2012,Stephen Curry New Shoes Under Armour,Stephen Curry Shoes Orange,Stephen Curry Shoes Olx,Name Of Stephen Curry Shoes,Pics Of Stephen Curry Shoes,Pictures Of Stephen Curry Shoes,Does Stephen Curry Have His Own Shoes,Stephen Curry Shoes Performance Test,Stephen Curry Shoes Pink,Stephen Curry Shoes Philippines Price,Stephen Curry Shoes Ph,Stephen Curry Shoes Red,Stephen Curry Shoes Release Dates,Stephen Curry Shoes Size 8,Stephen Curry Shoes Size 7,Stephen Curry Shoes Size 9.5,Stephen Curry Shoes Size 7.5,Stephen Curry Shoes Size 6,Stephen Curry Shoes Shop,Stephen Curry Shoes Sports Authority,Stephen Curry Shoes Sold Out,Stephen Curry Shoes Sc30,Stephen Curry Shoes Singapore,Stephen Curry The Bay Shoes,Stephen Curry Shoes Under Armour Price,Stephen Curry Shoes Ua,Stephen Curry Shoes Under Armor,Stephen Curry Shoes Under Armour For Sale,Stephen Curry Shoes Uk,What Is Stephen Curry Shoes,Shoes Worn By Stephen Curry,Stephen Curry Xmas Shoes,Stephen Curry Shoes Yellow And Blue,Stephen Curry Yellow Under Armour Shoes,Stephen Curry Shoes 2013,Stephen Curry Shoes 2014 For Sale,Stephen Curry Shoes 2014 All Star,Stephen Curry 3 Point Contest Shoes,Stephen Curry 54 Points Shoes

Leave a Reply